The Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019

The Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019: A Deep Dive into Global Conﬂict Dynamics

the armed conﬂict survey 2019 provides a comprehensive look into the state of global

conﬂicts during that year, oﬀering valuable insights into the trends, causes, and

consequences of warfare around the world. As conﬂicts continue to evolve in complexity,

understanding the data and analysis presented in this survey can shed light on not only

the hotspots of violence but also the broader implications for international security,

humanitarian issues, and peacebuilding eﬀorts.

Understanding the Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019

The armed conﬂict survey 2019 is an annual report that tracks and analyzes ongoing

conﬂicts worldwide, examining factors such as the number of active conﬂicts, intensity

levels, key actors involved, and the humanitarian impact. This survey often draws from

multiple sources, including governments, international organizations, NGOs, and conﬂict

monitoring groups, to present a well-rounded picture of the global security landscape.

What Sets the 2019 Survey Apart?

Unlike previous years, the 2019 edition highlights several signiﬁcant shifts in global

conﬂict patterns. For instance, while some longstanding wars continued with little change,

new conﬂicts emerged, and others escalated or de-escalated. This ﬂuidity underscores the

importance of continuous monitoring to grasp the ever-changing realities on the ground.

Additionally, the 2019 survey places a particular focus on the role of non-state actors,

cyber warfare, and proxy battles, reﬂecting the modern dimensions of armed conﬂict

beyond traditional state-on-state wars. These insights help policymakers and analysts

better understand the nuances shaping contemporary security challenges.

Key Findings from the Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019

When exploring the armed conﬂict survey 2019, several critical themes emerge that paint

a complex picture of global violence and instability.

1. Number and Intensity of Conﬂicts

The survey reported a total of over 50 active conﬂicts worldwide in 2019, ranging from

low-intensity skirmishes to full-scale civil wars. Notably, the number of high-intensity

conﬂicts—deﬁned by a threshold of battle-related deaths—remained alarmingly high,

indicating that despite international eﬀorts, some wars persist with devastating human

costs.

2. Geographical Distribution of Conﬂict

Certain regions stood out as particularly aﬀected by armed violence. The Middle East and

parts of Africa, such as the Sahel region, saw some of the most intense ﬁghting. Conﬂicts

in Syria, Yemen, and Libya continued to dominate headlines, while in Africa, insurgencies

and ethnic violence in countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Sudan

contributed to ongoing instability.

3. Humanitarian and Civilian Impact

One of the survey’s most sobering insights revolves around the humanitarian crisis

caused by these conﬂicts. The 2019 data highlights millions of displaced people,

widespread destruction of infrastructure, and a staggering number of civilian casualties.

The survey also underscores how prolonged conﬂicts exacerbate food insecurity,

healthcare collapse, and economic downturns in aﬀected regions.

The Role of Non-State Actors and Proxy Wars

Non-State Armed Groups

In 2019, the survey emphasized the growing inﬂuence of non-state actors such as militias,

insurgent groups, and terrorist organizations. These entities often operate outside

traditional military hierarchies, making conﬂicts harder to resolve. Groups like ISIS in the

Middle East and various rebel factions in Africa posed signiﬁcant challenges to state

sovereignty and peace initiatives.

Proxy Conﬂicts and International Involvement

Another critical trend highlighted in the armed conﬂict survey 2019 is the prevalence of

proxy wars, where regional or global powers support diﬀerent sides in a conﬂict to

advance their strategic interests without direct confrontation. This dynamic was especially

visible in the Middle East, where countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the United

States played roles in fueling or mediating conﬂicts.

Technological Evolution and Cyber Warfare

The 2019 survey also acknowledges the rising importance of cyber warfare as an

emerging battleﬁeld in modern conﬂicts. While physical violence remains central, cyber

attacks targeting critical infrastructure, communication networks, and government

systems have become tools of disruption and intimidation.

This shift represents a new frontier in armed conﬂict, where state and non-state actors

alike deploy technology to gain strategic advantages. Understanding this trend is vital for

future conﬂict prevention and response strategies.

Implications for Peacebuilding and Conﬂict Resolution

Reading through the armed conﬂict survey 2019, it becomes evident that addressing

modern warfare requires multifaceted approaches. Traditional military solutions are often

insuﬃcient when conﬂicts are fueled by deep-rooted ethnic tensions, political grievances,

and external inﬂuences.

Strategies Highlighted in the Survey

Inclusive Dialogue: Encouraging negotiations that involve all stakeholders,

including marginalized groups and non-state actors.

Strengthening Institutions: Building resilient governance structures that can

manage diversity and conﬂict peacefully.

International Cooperation: Enhancing collaboration between global powers and

local actors to reduce proxy conﬂicts and support peacekeeping.

Addressing Root Causes: Tackling issues such as poverty, inequality, and political

exclusion that often fuel violence.

These strategies reﬂect a growing recognition that sustainable peace depends on more

than just ceaseﬁres—it requires addressing the underlying conditions that give rise to

conﬂict.

Learning from the Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019: What Can Be

Done?

The insights from the armed conﬂict survey 2019 suggest several practical steps for

policymakers, humanitarian organizations, and civil society to better respond to ongoing

crises.

Improving Early Warning Systems

Enhanced conﬂict monitoring and data collection can help anticipate ﬂare-ups before they

escalate. Investing in technology and local networks to gather real-time information is

crucial.

Supporting Conﬂict-Aﬀected Communities

Humanitarian aid must be coupled with long-term development programs that promote

economic opportunities, education, and social cohesion to break cycles of violence.

Promoting Accountability and Justice

Addressing war crimes and human rights violations through international legal

frameworks can deter future abuses and foster reconciliation.

Engaging Youth and Women in Peace Processes

Involving diverse voices ensures that peace initiatives are more inclusive and

representative, increasing their chances of success.

Reﬂecting on the Broader Impact of Conﬂict in 2019

While the armed conﬂict survey 2019 focuses on data and analysis, its human side tells a

story of resilience amid tragedy. Millions aﬀected by war—whether displaced, injured, or

bereaved—remind us that behind every statistic lies a personal narrative.

Understanding the survey’s ﬁndings allows us to appreciate the complexity of modern

conﬂicts and the urgent need for comprehensive, compassionate responses. As the world

continues to grapple with these challenges, knowledge from reports like the armed

conﬂict survey 2019 is invaluable for shaping a safer future.

Question

Answer

What is the Armed Conﬂict

Survey 2019?

The Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019 is a comprehensive

annual report published by the International Institute for

Strategic Studies (IISS) that analyzes global armed

conﬂicts, their causes, dynamics, and impacts throughout

the year 2018 and early 2019.

Which regions were most

aﬀected by armed conﬂicts

according to the Armed

Conﬂict Survey 2019?

According to the Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019, the Middle

East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and parts of Asia remained the

most aﬀected regions by armed conﬂicts, with ongoing

crises in Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, and several African

countries.

What new trends in armed

conﬂicts were identiﬁed in

the 2019 survey?

The 2019 survey highlighted the increasing role of non-

state actors, the use of technology such as drones and

cyber warfare, and the growing complexity of proxy wars

involving regional and global powers.

How did the Armed Conﬂict

Survey 2019 describe the

situation in Syria?

The survey described Syria as a highly complex conﬂict

with multiple domestic and international actors involved,

ongoing humanitarian crises, and a shifting front line

primarily dominated by the Syrian government forces

and various opposition groups.

Did the Armed Conﬂict

Survey 2019 report any

signiﬁcant changes in the

conﬂict in Yemen?

Yes, the survey noted that the conﬂict in Yemen

continued to escalate in 2018, with increased

humanitarian suﬀering and limited progress toward

peace despite international eﬀorts.

What impact did the Armed

Conﬂict Survey 2019 note

regarding the use of drones

in warfare?

The survey emphasized that drones have become a

signiﬁcant factor in modern conﬂicts, enabling

surveillance and targeted strikes while raising concerns

about escalation and civilian casualties.

How does the Armed

Conﬂict Survey 2019

address the role of

international intervention in

conﬂicts?

The survey analyzes various international interventions,

noting that while some have helped contain violence,

others have complicated conﬂicts or prolonged ﬁghting

due to competing interests of foreign powers.

Where can one access the

Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019

report?

The Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019 report is available

through the International Institute for Strategic Studies

(IISS) website, typically requiring purchase or

subscription for full access.

The Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019: A Detailed Review and Analysis

the armed conﬂict survey 2019 stands as one of the most comprehensive annual

reports dedicated to evaluating the global landscape of armed conﬂicts. Produced by the

International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), this survey provides in-depth insights

into ongoing conﬂicts, their causes, dynamics, and the shifting geopolitical environment

inﬂuencing warfare worldwide. In a year marked by complex international tensions and

evolving patterns of violence, the 2019 edition oﬀers a critical lens through which

policymakers, academics, and security analysts can understand the state of global

security.

Understanding the Scope of the Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019

The armed conﬂict survey 2019 meticulously cataloged conﬂicts ranging from interstate

wars to insurgencies and civil wars, oﬀering a nuanced picture of the multifaceted nature

of modern warfare. Unlike traditional military analyses that focus solely on battleﬁeld

movements or troop deployments, this survey integrates political, economic, and social

factors that contribute to conﬂict persistence or resolution.

One of the notable features of the 2019 survey is its detailed classiﬁcation of conﬂicts by

intensity—from full-scale wars to low-level skirmishes—allowing readers to gauge not only

the geographical spread of violence but also its intensity and potential for escalation. This

multi-dimensional approach reﬂects the evolving nature of conﬂict, where hybrid warfare,

cyberattacks, and proxy engagements increasingly blur the lines between peace and war.

Key Findings and Trends in Global Conﬂict

The armed conﬂict survey 2019 highlighted several critical trends that shaped the

security environment during that period:

Persistence of Protracted Conﬂicts: Conﬂicts in Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan

continued to dominate headlines due to their prolonged duration and high human

cost. The report underscored the diﬃculties in achieving political settlements amid

fragmented opposition groups and foreign interventions.

Rise of Non-State Actors: The increased prominence of armed non-state groups

such as ISIS-aﬃliated factions, militias, and insurgents was a central theme. These

actors complicate peace eﬀorts and challenge traditional military responses.

Geopolitical Rivalries Fueling Proxy Wars: The survey emphasized how

regional powers, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Russia, engaged

indirectly in conﬂicts across the Middle East and Africa, thereby intensifying local

disputes and prolonging instability.

Technological and Cyber Dimensions: Although not the primary focus, the

report acknowledged the growing use of cyber warfare tactics and information

operations as integral elements of modern conﬂicts.

Regional Spotlight: Conﬂicts by Continent

The armed conﬂict survey 2019 provides a regional breakdown that reveals distinct

patterns and challenges:

Middle East and North Africa: This region remained the epicenter of violent

conﬂict, with the Syrian civil war continuing as the deadliest and most complex

crisis. Yemen’s humanitarian catastrophe, driven by the Saudi-led coalition’s

intervention and Houthi insurgency, was another focal point. Libya’s fragile post-

Gaddaﬁ environment also saw renewed clashes among various militias and political

factions.

Sub-Saharan Africa: Conﬂicts in the Sahel, particularly in Mali and Burkina Faso,

escalated due to jihadist insurgencies and weak state control. Nigeria grappled with

Boko Haram and separatist tensions, while the Democratic Republic of Congo faced

ongoing violence fueled by ethnic militias.

Asia-Paciﬁc: Afghanistan’s stalemate between the Taliban and government forces

persisted, complicated by U.S.-Taliban negotiations. Additionally, border skirmishes

between India and Pakistan in Kashmir underscored the volatility of longstanding

territorial disputes.

Europe: The armed conﬂict survey 2019 also touched on the conﬂict in eastern

Ukraine, where hostilities between Ukrainian forces and Russian-backed separatists

continued despite ceaseﬁre attempts.

Analytical Perspectives on the Armed Conﬂict Survey 2019

Beyond cataloging conﬂicts, the armed conﬂict survey 2019 oﬀers analytical frameworks

that help interpret the data and understand broader security implications.

The Role of International Intervention

The survey critically examines the impact of external military interventions, both state-led

and multilateral, on conﬂict trajectories. In Syria, international actors like Russia and the

United States signiﬁcantly inﬂuenced the balance of power, often complicating peace

negotiations. Similarly, the Saudi-led coalition’s involvement in Yemen was scrutinized for

its contribution to the humanitarian crisis and prolonged ﬁghting.

Analysts observe that while intervention can shift military dynamics, it rarely resolves

underlying political grievances. In many cases, interventions have led to unintended

consequences, such as empowering extremist factions or fragmenting opposition groups.

Challenges in Conﬂict Resolution and Peacebuilding

The 2019 survey underscores the persistent challenges in transitioning from conﬂict to

peace. Fragmented rebel groups, contested governance, and external patronage often

obstruct negotiations. Moreover, the survey highlights the importance of addressing root

causes such as economic deprivation, ethnic tensions, and political exclusion.

One of the nuanced observations is the increasing diﬃculty in implementing traditional

peacekeeping operations in environments where non-state actors dominate and state

sovereignty is contested. This calls for innovative approaches that blend diplomacy,

development, and security sector reforms.

Technological Evolution and Warfare

While the armed conﬂict survey 2019 primarily focuses on conventional armed conﬂicts, it

acknowledges the rising signiﬁcance of new technologies. Cyber warfare, drones, and

information campaigns have become integral to conﬂict strategies, enabling actors to

project power asymmetrically and target civilian infrastructure without direct combat.

This technological evolution demands adaptive policy responses and highlights the blurred

boundaries between war and peace in the digital age.

Implications for Future Security and Policy Making

The insights from the armed conﬂict survey 2019 provide valuable considerations for

governments, international organizations, and security practitioners.

Holistic Conﬂict Management: Addressing armed conﬂicts requires integrated

strategies that combine military, diplomatic, humanitarian, and development

eﬀorts.

Focus on Local Dynamics: Sustainable peace hinges on understanding local

grievances and power structures rather than imposing external solutions.

Managing Proxy Conﬂicts: Reducing the inﬂuence of external actors in proxy

wars is crucial to de-escalating regional tensions.

Adapting to New Warfare Forms: Policymakers must develop frameworks to

counter cyber threats and regulate the use of emerging military technologies.

The armed conﬂict survey 2019 remains an indispensable resource for those seeking to

grasp the complexities of modern warfare. By blending empirical data with analytical

depth, it paints a sobering yet informative portrait of a world where conﬂicts persist amid

shifting power dynamics and technological change. As the global community confronts

these challenges, such detailed assessments will continue to shape more eﬀective and

nuanced responses to armed violence.

armed conﬂict analysis, 2019 conﬂict report, global violence overview, conﬂict zones

2019, war and peace study, conﬂict trends 2019, international security report, armed

violence data, conﬂict resolution 2019, military engagement survey